What Does the Proposed Housing Bill Do to Help the U.S. Subprime Mortgage Problems?
By Randall | April 3rd, 2008 | Category: Housing Bubble | 10 comments 985 views | 10 Comments » |
Yesterday, congress reached a compromise bill to provide aid to those facing foreclosure or already in the midst of a foreclosure. This $15-20 billion dollar bill (all puns intended) will attempt to help deflate the housing bubble in a more controlled manner, and try to prevent the U.S. economy from going into (more) of a tailspin.
Debate has been going on over one particular point; The ability of bankruptcy judges to unilaterally modify the mortgage agreements for those filing bankruptcy. Ultimately, to get the bill to a point where it even had a HOPE of passing, it had to be removed from the proposed bill. That means that even with bankruptcy proceedings, the most that can happen is to restructure the existing debt. If the person(s) filing bankruptcy can’t pay for the house under ANY means, it’s still going back to the bank.
What the Bill Does
There’s a number of things the bill will allow to happen to help those that are about to lose their homes, and to help others and the economy deal with the existing HUGE backlog of foreclosed properties. As written (and remember, it’s still in the debate phase, so things can change, or the president could veto it entirely)
- Provide a $7000 tax credit, split over two years, for buyers of homes that are about to go to foreclosure or already in foreclosure.
- The issuance of $10 Billion worth of tax-free bonds, with the proceeds to go to help refinance mortgages in trouble (the criteria or selection process hasn’t been completely explained yet).
- The net operating loss carry-back tax rule for 2008-2009 would be extended by two years. That means that related industries (contractors, builders, materials suppliers and a whole myriad of other businesses related to the housing market) could write off their losses over 4 years, instead of the standard 2. It might make the difference between surviving and bankruptcy to some smaller businesses to do this.
- Provide existing homeowners with a standard tax deduction of $500 for single filers or $1000 for joint filers. Finally, a little reward for keeping yourself in check!
- The FHA loan limit would rise to 110 percent of an area’s median home price, with a cap of $550,000 and a 3-1/2 percent down payment required from the borrower. This is an increase from the previous loan amounts the FHA would guarantee in years past.
- Provide cities and communities with $4 Billion in federal grant money to purchase, fix up (where necessary) and resell foreclosed houses in the area. This is to prevent many of the ‘housing deserts’ that are starting to crop up in some cities; Large tracts of either unsold houses, or houses that have been foreclosed on, causing the surrounding area to be virtually abandoned.
- Provide for debt counseling; $100 million would go to provide free ‘Mortgage Counselors’ (already free through the FHA, but in limited numbers) to work with families to find alternatives to foreclosure, and to negotiate with lenders on the borrowers behalf to try to broker a better mortgage deal.
- Put in place a stipulation for lenders to follow special procedures for U.S. Armed forces members coming back from combat. This would hopefully allow our returning military members the chance to have some breathing room and get their affairs back in order before any dire financial actions would be taken by the lenders. Another great provision of this bill, in my opinion.
- Require lenders to MAKE the borrowers read and understand what they are getting into when they get a mortgage. (If this had been in force before, I’m betting a lot of the Adjustable Rate Mortgage buyers might have thought twice before getting into their situations).
Who Foots the Bill for the Bill
Of course There Ain’t No Such Thing as a Free Lunch (TANSTAAFL) and this is no exception. It’s going to come out of taxpayer money. If you’ve visited before, you know I’m none too fond of the idea of paying for someone else’s mistakes on the mortgage front, but there is a point where you just have to bite the bullet and do what’s in the best interest of the country. I think we’ve reached that point, and maybe a bit beyond. This housing bubble, no matter who’s fault it is or how it was triggered, has grown to the point that it threatens to do some serious damage to the U.S. economy, and by extension, the entire world economy.
Sen.’s Clinton and Obama are both in favor of pretty powerful legislation (see above) to stem the flow of financial blood from this wound, while Sen. McCain is in a more ‘let the industry correct itself’ opinion. I think that either solution might be a little too far (in either the liberal or conservative directions), but this bill being discussed is starting to sound like an acceptable compromise to do what has to be done for our economy,
This may be just the first legislation (with more to come) to address the housing crisis, but something substantial needs to be done before the patient (the U.S. economy) bleeds out from all the financial problems. Even a band-aid at this point would be an improvement.
What do you think about the proposed housing bill? Too much, or not enough?? What would you add to it if you could? Leave us a comment and let us know.

The part that really gets me is this – $7k tax credit for people in foreclosure, and $1000 tax deduction for me, a responsible home owner.
So my irresponsible neighbor gets a free $7,000 check, and I will get a measly deduction worth roughly $300. In essense, I subsidize my neighbors stupid decision and irresponsibility through paying my taxes.
Perhaps I should stop paying taxes. Maybe next time around there will be a bailout for idiots like me.
Don’t mean to sound bitter… but it really gets under my skin to read about potential HANDOUTS to people who make poor decisions. It peeves me even more when folks like you and I are paying the price.
Higher taxes ( likely at some point, money isn’t free ), higher inflation due to all the free money being dropped from helicopters… higher prices for everything.
Our government makes poor decisions too.
I don’t think this solution is best for our country. All it does is prove to folks who make poor decisions that their is no penalty for failing financially.. the government will come to rescue. It’s like raising a child – if the child does something bad and is never reprimanded…. they will continue to make bad choices.
Sorry for the rambling.
Llama Money’s last blog post..My Dumbest Purchase Ever – Lincoln Navigator
Great post – it’s interesting to read the details.
I’m with Llama – not a big fan of buyouts for stupid people but as you say, maybe it’s better for everyone.
I like the debt counseling aspect along with the “make them read it” rule…
Mike
Four Pillars’s last blog post..Book Meme
How, precisely, does a mortgage lender “MAKE the borrowers read and understand”? Isn’t that why they have to sign the paperwork? Their signature indicates that they have read and understand what they are doing.
I’m a high school teacher — believe me when I say that you *cannot* enforce understanding. You can require papers to be written, tests to be taken, you can read it aloud to them, and do a thousand other things, but you can’t force someone to read and understand something. Cheats will circulate on the internet, providing all the answers to whatever questions a person would ask them to “be sure they understand”.
Like you say in the post, if folks had bothered to do this in the first place, the country wouldn’t be in the mess it’s in with regards to the housing bubble.
I agree with Llama — I have a *serious* problem with my idiot neighbor getting free money (to spend however he pleases — not necessarily to cover his debts and make his situation right) while I, the responsible one, not only do what I’m supposed to do, but also foot the bill for him to continue his idiocy.
Damsel’s last blog post..Deodorant
I have to agree with everyone.
What about those of us who were smart, who limited their purchase to what they could afford(even though in my case it means much less house that we would like and will need eventually), who bothered to ask questions and really understand and do research before buying a home? When is the bailout coming for us? My mortgage isn’t great. We didn’t have a down payment, so we have an 80% and a 20%. Can the government forgive my 20% loan? Maybe we shouldn’t have bought without a down payment, but we have (large) dogs, and no one would rent to us.
I don’t necessarily agree that the governement should be bailing out the stupid people, but I guess it is better than a depression. I would rather have them try to avert it than have to live through something like that. We can’t change the past, but hopefully the future will be better, hopefully people will learn and quit being greedy and our economy will be stronger in the long run. That’s my hope anyway.
“The part that really gets me is this – $7k tax credit for people in foreclosure, and $1000 tax deduction for me, a responsible home owner.”
As I understand it, that’s not what’s happening. The tax credit goes to people who are BUYING the foreclosed property, not the people who owned the home. It’s a measure to increase demand for housing. Really what it does is transfer losses from sellers of those homes to the government (i.e. taxpayer), so it’s $7k per house to the banks. It’s a bank bailout provision.
@Llama, Enginerd is right. The $7k is for the NEXT BUYER of the foreclosed house. But even that sounds a little too good. Buy a house for a HUGE discount AND get the government to foot $7k in tax credits. It feels a little like taking advantage of the poor (stupid) souls that bought the big house and let it go back. The next guy gets quite a deal!
Looks like I misunderstood the $7k credit. Still, I don’t understand the thinking behind it. Why should the government care if I buy a foreclosed property vs a shiny newly built house down the street? There must be something I’m missing here…
Llama Money’s last blog post..Dividends are a blast
@LLama, the idea is to get the foreclosed houses sold, so they don’t pull down the price of surrounding houses. It can cause a domino effect, bringing down surrounding house prices, and causing those houses to not sell also.
It’s estimated that for each foreclosed house in an area, the surrounding house values drop by 3%. Get too many of those, and the whole neighborhood spirals down in price, then quality.
I guess that makes some sense. Better to keep an existing neighborhood in decent shape and sacrifice the new neighborhood. I guess anyway. I’m certainly no real estate expert.
Don’t foreclosed homes usually end up on the auction block anyway, going to the highest bidder?
Llama Money’s last blog post..The Swimming Pool Dilemma
Yes, they go up for auction, but only if back taxes are owed. Otherwise the bank just ‘repossesses’ the house and owns it outright. If the house goes up for auction, the bank holding the note bids at least the amount owed, and they get the house unless someone else bids higher.